Skip to main content

Chifley vs Matraville

Property investment comparison - Chifley, NSW 2036 vs Matraville, NSW 2036

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Chifley wins 1, Matraville wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricChifleyMatraville
Median house price$2.8M$2.8M
Median unit price-$955K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.90%3.14%
Gross rental yield (units)1.72%4.33%
1-year house growth-0.7%+1.6%estimate
3-year house growth-4.9%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.0%
Population3,4909,925

Chifley vs Matraville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.8M in Chifley and $2.8M in Matraville, so Chifley is the cheaper entry point, with Matraville houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Matraville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.14%, compared with 2.90% in Chifley, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Chifley and +1.6% in Matraville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Matraville, while Chifley went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Matraville and 1.5% in Chifley, so landlords in Matraville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Matraville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,925 against 3,490, roughly 2.8 times the size of Chifley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Matraville for rental income, Chifley for a lower purchase price, Matraville for recent price momentum, Matraville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison