Chigwell vs Cuprona
Property investment comparison - Chigwell, TAS 7011 vs Cuprona, TAS 7316
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Chigwell wins 2, Cuprona wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Chigwell | Cuprona |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $590K | $600K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.00% | 4.83% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.31% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +20.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +10.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 0.7% |
| Population | 2,050 | 140 |
Chigwell vs Cuprona: what the numbers say
The median house price is $590K in Chigwell and $600K in Cuprona, so Chigwell is the cheaper entry point, with Cuprona houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Chigwell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.00%, compared with 4.83% in Cuprona, a gap of 0.17 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Cuprona and 1.2% in Chigwell, so landlords in Cuprona face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Chigwell is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,050 against 140, roughly 15 times the size of Cuprona; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Chigwell for rental income, Chigwell for a lower purchase price, Cuprona for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison