Chirnside Park vs Tremont
Property investment comparison - Chirnside Park, VIC 3116 vs Tremont, VIC 3785
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Chirnside Park wins 1, Tremont wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Chirnside Park | Tremont |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $990K | $990K |
| Median unit price | - | $490K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.67% | 4.08% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.99% |
| 1-year house growth | +5.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +10.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Population | 11,779 | 69 |
Chirnside Park vs Tremont: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $990K in Chirnside Park and $990K in Tremont.
On cash flow, Tremont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.08%, compared with 3.67% in Chirnside Park, a gap of 0.41 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.1%.
Chirnside Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,779 against 69, roughly 171 times the size of Tremont; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tremont for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Chirnside Park, VIC 3116
Open Chirnside Park suburb profileRecent sales in Chirnside Park
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison