Skip to main content

Chiswick vs Curl Curl

Property investment comparison - Chiswick, NSW 2046 vs Curl Curl, NSW 2096

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Chiswick wins 4, Curl Curl wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricChiswickCurl Curl
Median house price$4.1M$4.2M
Median unit price$1.2M$1.8M
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.07%
Gross rental yield (units)3.83%3.20%
1-year house growth+7.2%estimate+4.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.9%1.5%
Population2,9092,364

Chiswick vs Curl Curl: what the numbers say

The median house price is $4.1M in Chiswick and $4.2M in Curl Curl, so Chiswick is the cheaper entry point, with Curl Curl houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Chiswick sits at a median of $1.2M against $1.8M in Curl Curl, which makes Chiswick the more affordable unit market and Curl Curl the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.2% in Chiswick (an estimate) and +4.2% in Curl Curl (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Chiswick, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Curl Curl and 2.9% in Chiswick, so landlords in Curl Curl face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Chiswick is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,909 against 2,364, larger than Curl Curl; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Chiswick for a lower purchase price, Chiswick for recent price momentum, Curl Curl for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison