Skip to main content

Chiswick vs Kemps Creek

Property investment comparison - Chiswick, NSW 2046 vs Kemps Creek, NSW 2178

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Chiswick wins 2, Kemps Creek wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricChiswickKemps Creek
Median house price$4.1M$4.1M
Median unit price$1.2M$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)-0.99%
Gross rental yield (units)3.83%-
1-year house growth+7.2%estimate+1.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.9%0.6%
Population2,9092,121

Chiswick vs Kemps Creek: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $4.1M in Chiswick and $4.1M in Kemps Creek.

For units, Chiswick sits at a median of $1.2M against $1.3M in Kemps Creek, which makes Chiswick the more affordable unit market and Kemps Creek the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.2% in Chiswick (an estimate) and +1.6% in Kemps Creek (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Chiswick, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Kemps Creek and 2.9% in Chiswick, so landlords in Kemps Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Chiswick is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,909 against 2,121, larger than Kemps Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Chiswick for recent price momentum, Kemps Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison