Skip to main content

Churchill vs Dundowran

Property investment comparison - Churchill, QLD 4305 vs Dundowran, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Churchill wins 3, Dundowran wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricChurchillDundowran
Median house price$775K$775K
Median unit price$320K$685K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.85%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.13%
1-year house growth+20.6%estimate+2.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%3.5%
Population1,8421,085

Churchill vs Dundowran: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $775K in Churchill and $775K in Dundowran.

For units, Churchill sits at a median of $320K against $685K in Dundowran, which makes Churchill the more affordable unit market and Dundowran the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.6% in Churchill (an estimate) and +2.9% in Dundowran (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Churchill, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Churchill and 3.5% in Dundowran, so landlords in Churchill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Churchill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,842 against 1,085, larger than Dundowran; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Churchill for recent price momentum, Churchill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison