Churchill vs Yundool
Property investment comparison - Churchill, VIC 3842 vs Yundool, VIC 3727
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Churchill wins 2, Yundool wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Churchill | Yundool |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $460K | $455K |
| Median unit price | $430K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.08% | 2.77% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.45% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +17.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +27.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.3% | 16.7% |
| Population | 4,924 | 52 |
Churchill vs Yundool: what the numbers say
The median house price is $460K in Churchill and $455K in Yundool, so Yundool is the cheaper entry point, with Churchill houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Churchill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.08%, compared with 2.77% in Yundool, a gap of 2.31 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Churchill and 16.7% in Yundool, so landlords in Churchill face less competition for tenants.
Churchill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,924 against 52, roughly 95 times the size of Yundool; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Churchill for rental income, Yundool for a lower purchase price, Churchill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison