Claremont vs Glaziers Bay
Property investment comparison - Claremont, TAS 7011 vs Glaziers Bay, TAS 7109
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Claremont wins 2, Glaziers Bay wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Claremont | Glaziers Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $630K | $635K |
| Median unit price | $490K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.70% | 4.62% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.28% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +15.6%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.5% |
| Population | 8,397 | 112 |
Claremont vs Glaziers Bay: what the numbers say
The median house price is $630K in Claremont and $635K in Glaziers Bay, so Claremont is the cheaper entry point, with Glaziers Bay houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Claremont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 4.62% in Glaziers Bay, a gap of 0.08 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Glaziers Bay and 0.9% in Claremont, so landlords in Glaziers Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Claremont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,397 against 112, roughly 75 times the size of Glaziers Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Claremont for rental income, Claremont for a lower purchase price, Glaziers Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison