Skip to main content

Claremont vs West Ulverstone

Property investment comparison - Claremont, TAS 7011 vs West Ulverstone, TAS 7315

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Claremont wins 3, West Ulverstone wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClaremontWest Ulverstone
Median house price$630K$625K
Median unit price$490K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.70%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.28%4.60%
1-year house growth+15.6%estimate+14.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%1.0%
Population8,3974,515

Claremont vs West Ulverstone: what the numbers say

The median house price is $630K in Claremont and $625K in West Ulverstone, so West Ulverstone is the cheaper entry point, with Claremont houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.6% in Claremont (an estimate) and +14.3% in West Ulverstone (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Claremont, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Claremont and 1.0% in West Ulverstone, so landlords in Claremont face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Claremont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,397 against 4,515, larger than West Ulverstone; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: West Ulverstone for a lower purchase price, Claremont for recent price momentum, Claremont for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison