Clarkes Hill vs Glenroy
Property investment comparison - Clarkes Hill, VIC 3352 vs Glenroy, VIC 3046
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clarkes Hill wins 0, Glenroy wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Clarkes Hill | Glenroy |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $870K | $870K |
| Median unit price | - | $630K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.52% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.40% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +9.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Population | 75 | 23,792 |
Clarkes Hill vs Glenroy: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $870K in Clarkes Hill and $870K in Glenroy.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Glenroy and 1.9% in Clarkes Hill, so landlords in Glenroy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Glenroy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 23,792 against 75, roughly 317 times the size of Clarkes Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Glenroy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison