Clematis vs Coburg North
Property investment comparison - Clematis, VIC 3782 vs Coburg North, VIC 3058
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clematis wins 1, Coburg North wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Clematis | Coburg North |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $825K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.18% | 3.20% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.35% | 4.67% |
| 1-year house growth | - | -0.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.8% | 1.3% |
| Population | 352 | 8,327 |
Clematis vs Coburg North: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Clematis and $1.1M in Coburg North, so Clematis is the cheaper entry point, with Coburg North houses about 1% dearer.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.18% in Clematis and 3.20% in Coburg North, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Coburg North and 2.8% in Clematis, so landlords in Coburg North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Coburg North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,327 against 352, roughly 24 times the size of Clematis; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Clematis for a lower purchase price, Coburg North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison