Skip to main content

Clematis vs Seddon

Property investment comparison - Clematis, VIC 3782 vs Seddon, VIC 3011

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clematis wins 1, Seddon wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClematisSeddon
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$825K$715K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.18%3.45%
Gross rental yield (units)3.35%-
1-year house growth--1.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.8%1.6%
Population3525,143

Clematis vs Seddon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Clematis and $1.1M in Seddon, so Clematis is the cheaper entry point, with Seddon houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Clematis sits at a median of $825K against $715K in Seddon, which makes Seddon the more affordable unit market and Clematis the pricier one.

On cash flow, Seddon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.45%, compared with 3.18% in Clematis, a gap of 0.27 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Seddon and 2.8% in Clematis, so landlords in Seddon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Seddon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,143 against 352, roughly 15 times the size of Clematis; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Seddon for rental income, Clematis for a lower purchase price, Seddon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Clematis vs Seddon: Property Investment Comparison (2026)