Skip to main content

Clematis vs Woodend

Property investment comparison - Clematis, VIC 3782 vs Woodend, VIC 3442

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clematis wins 0, Woodend wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClematisWoodend
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$825K$710K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.18%3.26%
Gross rental yield (units)3.35%4.19%
1-year house growth-+9.3%
3-year house growth-+0.5%
Vacancy rate2.8%0.3%
Population3526,732

Clematis vs Woodend: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Clematis and $1.1M in Woodend, so Woodend is the cheaper entry point, with Clematis houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Clematis sits at a median of $825K against $710K in Woodend, which makes Woodend the more affordable unit market and Clematis the pricier one.

On cash flow, Woodend leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.26%, compared with 3.18% in Clematis, a gap of 0.08 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Woodend and 2.8% in Clematis, so landlords in Woodend face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woodend is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,732 against 352, roughly 19 times the size of Clematis; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woodend for rental income, Woodend for a lower purchase price, Woodend for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison