Skip to main content

Clemton Park vs Kurrajong Hills

Property investment comparison - Clemton Park, NSW 2206 vs Kurrajong Hills, NSW 2758

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clemton Park wins 4, Kurrajong Hills wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClemton ParkKurrajong Hills
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$805K$2.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.47%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.96%-
1-year house growth+7.3%-0.9%estimate
3-year house growth+20.2%-
Vacancy rate0.8%7.6%
Population1,676705

Clemton Park vs Kurrajong Hills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Clemton Park and $1.9M in Kurrajong Hills, so Clemton Park is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Clemton Park sits at a median of $805K against $2.0M in Kurrajong Hills, which makes Clemton Park the more affordable unit market and Kurrajong Hills the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.3% in Clemton Park and -0.9% in Kurrajong Hills (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Clemton Park, while Kurrajong Hills went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Clemton Park and 7.6% in Kurrajong Hills, so landlords in Clemton Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Clemton Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,676 against 705, roughly 2.4 times the size of Kurrajong Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Clemton Park for a lower purchase price, Clemton Park for recent price momentum, Clemton Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison