Skip to main content

Clifton vs Enmore

Property investment comparison - Clifton, NSW 2515 vs Enmore, NSW 2042

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clifton wins 1, Enmore wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCliftonEnmore
Median house price$2.0M$2.0M
Median unit price$1.1M$955K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.55%2.84%
Gross rental yield (units)4.39%-
1-year house growth-+3.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.5%1.0%
Population353,871

Clifton vs Enmore: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Clifton and $2.0M in Enmore, so Enmore is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Clifton sits at a median of $1.1M against $955K in Enmore, which makes Enmore the more affordable unit market and Clifton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Clifton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.55%, compared with 2.84% in Enmore, a gap of 0.71 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Enmore and 2.5% in Clifton, so landlords in Enmore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Enmore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,871 against 35, roughly 111 times the size of Clifton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Clifton for rental income, Enmore for a lower purchase price, Enmore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison