Skip to main content

Clontarf vs Pacific Paradise

Property investment comparison - Clontarf, QLD 4019 vs Pacific Paradise, QLD 4564

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clontarf wins 2, Pacific Paradise wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClontarfPacific Paradise
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+17.0%+13.4%estimate
3-year house growth+39.9%-
Vacancy rate0.6%0.8%
Population8,4462,675

Clontarf vs Pacific Paradise: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Clontarf and $1.0M in Pacific Paradise.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.0% in Clontarf and +13.4% in Pacific Paradise (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Clontarf, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Clontarf and 0.8% in Pacific Paradise, so landlords in Clontarf face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Clontarf is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,446 against 2,675, roughly 3.2 times the size of Pacific Paradise; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Clontarf for recent price momentum, Clontarf for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison