Skip to main content

Cloverdale vs Greenmount

Property investment comparison - Cloverdale, WA 6105 vs Greenmount, WA 6056

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cloverdale wins 3, Greenmount wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCloverdaleGreenmount
Median house price$880K$880K
Median unit price$605K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%4.13%
Gross rental yield (units)5.95%4.95%
1-year house growth+18.6%+15.7%estimate
3-year house growth+79.1%-
Vacancy rate1.6%2.4%
Population8,8642,666

Cloverdale vs Greenmount: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $880K in Cloverdale and $880K in Greenmount.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.10% in Cloverdale and 4.13% in Greenmount, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.6% in Cloverdale and +15.7% in Greenmount (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Cloverdale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Cloverdale and 2.4% in Greenmount, so landlords in Cloverdale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cloverdale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,864 against 2,666, roughly 3.3 times the size of Greenmount; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cloverdale for recent price momentum, Cloverdale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison