Skip to main content

Clyde North vs Hepburn Springs

Property investment comparison - Clyde North, VIC 3978 vs Hepburn Springs, VIC 3461

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clyde North wins 1, Hepburn Springs wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClyde NorthHepburn Springs
Median house price$760K$760K
Median unit price$600K$500K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.70%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.54%
1-year house growth+5.1%estimate+0.6%
3-year house growth--3.2%
Vacancy rate2.9%1.2%
Population31,681368

Clyde North vs Hepburn Springs: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $760K in Clyde North and $760K in Hepburn Springs.

For units, Clyde North sits at a median of $600K against $500K in Hepburn Springs, which makes Hepburn Springs the more affordable unit market and Clyde North the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.1% in Clyde North (an estimate) and +0.6% in Hepburn Springs, so recent momentum favours Clyde North, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Hepburn Springs and 2.9% in Clyde North, so landlords in Hepburn Springs face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Clyde North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 31,681 against 368, roughly 86 times the size of Hepburn Springs; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Clyde North for recent price momentum, Hepburn Springs for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison