Skip to main content

Clyde North vs Lancefield

Property investment comparison - Clyde North, VIC 3978 vs Lancefield, VIC 3435

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clyde North wins 0, Lancefield wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClyde NorthLancefield
Median house price$760K$760K
Median unit price$600K$500K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.20%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.31%
1-year house growth+5.1%estimate+6.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.9%2.6%
Population31,6812,743

Clyde North vs Lancefield: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $760K in Clyde North and $760K in Lancefield.

For units, Clyde North sits at a median of $600K against $500K in Lancefield, which makes Lancefield the more affordable unit market and Clyde North the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.1% in Clyde North (an estimate) and +6.3% in Lancefield (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Lancefield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Lancefield and 2.9% in Clyde North, so landlords in Lancefield face less competition for tenants.

Clyde North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 31,681 against 2,743, roughly 12 times the size of Lancefield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lancefield for recent price momentum, Lancefield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison