Skip to main content

Clyde North vs Mount Cottrell

Property investment comparison - Clyde North, VIC 3978 vs Mount Cottrell, VIC 3024

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clyde North wins 1, Mount Cottrell wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClyde NorthMount Cottrell
Median house price$760K$760K
Median unit price$600K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.50%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.24%
1-year house growth+5.1%estimate-3.0%
3-year house growth-+26.7%
Vacancy rate2.9%0.7%
Population31,681496

Clyde North vs Mount Cottrell: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $760K in Clyde North and $760K in Mount Cottrell.

For units, Clyde North sits at a median of $600K against $580K in Mount Cottrell, which makes Mount Cottrell the more affordable unit market and Clyde North the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.1% in Clyde North (an estimate) and -3.0% in Mount Cottrell, so recent momentum favours Clyde North, while Mount Cottrell went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Mount Cottrell and 2.9% in Clyde North, so landlords in Mount Cottrell face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Clyde North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 31,681 against 496, roughly 64 times the size of Mount Cottrell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Clyde North for recent price momentum, Mount Cottrell for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison