Skip to main content

Coal Point vs Point Clare

Property investment comparison - Coal Point, NSW 2283 vs Point Clare, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coal Point wins 2, Point Clare wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoal PointPoint Clare
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$600K$835K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.90%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.35%4.26%
1-year house growth+5.1%+8.8%estimate
3-year house growth+15.3%-
Vacancy rate2.1%0.4%
Population1,7493,974

Coal Point vs Point Clare: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Coal Point and $1.2M in Point Clare.

For units, Coal Point sits at a median of $600K against $835K in Point Clare, which makes Coal Point the more affordable unit market and Point Clare the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.1% in Coal Point and +8.8% in Point Clare (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Point Clare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Point Clare and 2.1% in Coal Point, so landlords in Point Clare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Point Clare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,974 against 1,749, roughly 2.3 times the size of Coal Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Point Clare for recent price momentum, Point Clare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison