Skip to main content

Cobbitty vs Fairfield West

Property investment comparison - Cobbitty, NSW 2570 vs Fairfield West, NSW 2165

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cobbitty wins 2, Fairfield West wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCobbittyFairfield West
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%2.78%
Gross rental yield (units)2.68%5.00%
1-year house growth+11.5%estimate+8.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.9%1.7%
Population4,20612,981

Cobbitty vs Fairfield West: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Cobbitty and $1.3M in Fairfield West.

On cash flow, Cobbitty leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.78% in Fairfield West, a gap of 0.32 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.5% in Cobbitty (an estimate) and +8.2% in Fairfield West (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Cobbitty, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Fairfield West and 3.9% in Cobbitty, so landlords in Fairfield West face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fairfield West is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,981 against 4,206, roughly 3.1 times the size of Cobbitty; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cobbitty for rental income, Cobbitty for recent price momentum, Fairfield West for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Cobbitty vs Fairfield West: Suburb Comparison 2026