Skip to main content

Cobbitty vs Liverpool

Property investment comparison - Cobbitty, NSW 2570 vs Liverpool, NSW 2170

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cobbitty wins 3, Liverpool wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCobbittyLiverpool
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$535K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%2.65%
Gross rental yield (units)2.68%5.58%
1-year house growth+11.5%estimate+10.3%
3-year house growth-+23.9%
Vacancy rate3.9%1.3%
Population4,20631,078

Cobbitty vs Liverpool: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Cobbitty and $1.3M in Liverpool, so Cobbitty is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Cobbitty leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.65% in Liverpool, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.5% in Cobbitty (an estimate) and +10.3% in Liverpool, so recent momentum favours Cobbitty, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Liverpool and 3.9% in Cobbitty, so landlords in Liverpool face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Liverpool is the bigger suburb, with a population of 31,078 against 4,206, roughly 7 times the size of Cobbitty; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cobbitty for rental income, Cobbitty for a lower purchase price, Cobbitty for recent price momentum, Liverpool for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison