Skip to main content

Cobbitty vs Ocean Shores

Property investment comparison - Cobbitty, NSW 2570 vs Ocean Shores, NSW 2483

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cobbitty wins 2, Ocean Shores wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCobbittyOcean Shores
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$940K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%3.85%
Gross rental yield (units)2.68%4.15%
1-year house growth+11.5%estimate+2.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.9%0.8%
Population4,2065,777

Cobbitty vs Ocean Shores: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Cobbitty and $1.3M in Ocean Shores, so Cobbitty is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Ocean Shores leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.85%, compared with 3.10% in Cobbitty, a gap of 0.75 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.5% in Cobbitty (an estimate) and +2.9% in Ocean Shores (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Cobbitty, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Ocean Shores and 3.9% in Cobbitty, so landlords in Ocean Shores face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ocean Shores is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,777 against 4,206, larger than Cobbitty; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ocean Shores for rental income, Cobbitty for a lower purchase price, Cobbitty for recent price momentum, Ocean Shores for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison