Skip to main content

Cobblebank vs Newcomb

Property investment comparison - Cobblebank, VIC 3338 vs Newcomb, VIC 3219

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cobblebank wins 0, Newcomb wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCobblebankNewcomb
Median house price$645K$645K
Median unit price-$510K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.95%
Gross rental yield (units)4.40%4.40%
1-year house growth+3.5%+11.7%
3-year house growth-1.3%+11.0%
Vacancy rate2.2%1.6%
Population3,6014,704

Cobblebank vs Newcomb: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $645K in Cobblebank and $645K in Newcomb.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.5% in Cobblebank and +11.7% in Newcomb, so recent momentum favours Newcomb, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Cobblebank houses are -1.3% and Newcomb houses +11.0%, so Newcomb has compounded faster than Cobblebank over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Newcomb and 2.2% in Cobblebank, so landlords in Newcomb face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Newcomb is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,704 against 3,601, larger than Cobblebank; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Newcomb for recent price momentum, Newcomb for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison