Skip to main content

Cobblebank vs Wodonga

Property investment comparison - Cobblebank, VIC 3338 vs Wodonga, VIC 3690

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cobblebank wins 0, Wodonga wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCobblebankWodonga
Median house price$645K$645K
Median unit price-$415K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)4.40%5.33%
1-year house growth+3.5%+12.3%
3-year house growth-1.3%+18.4%
Vacancy rate2.2%1.4%
Population3,60120,259

Cobblebank vs Wodonga: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $645K in Cobblebank and $645K in Wodonga.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.5% in Cobblebank and +12.3% in Wodonga, so recent momentum favours Wodonga, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Cobblebank houses are -1.3% and Wodonga houses +18.4%, so Wodonga has compounded faster than Cobblebank over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Wodonga and 2.2% in Cobblebank, so landlords in Wodonga face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wodonga is the bigger suburb, with a population of 20,259 against 3,601, roughly 6 times the size of Cobblebank; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wodonga for recent price momentum, Wodonga for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison