Skip to main content

Coburg North vs Croydon North

Property investment comparison - Coburg North, VIC 3058 vs Croydon North, VIC 3136

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coburg North wins 3, Croydon North wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoburg NorthCroydon North
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$715K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%3.57%
Gross rental yield (units)4.67%4.50%
1-year house growth-0.2%estimate+0.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.3%1.6%
Population8,3278,092

Coburg North vs Croydon North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Coburg North and $1.1M in Croydon North, so Coburg North is the cheaper entry point, with Croydon North houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Croydon North leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.57%, compared with 3.20% in Coburg North, a gap of 0.37 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.2% in Coburg North (an estimate) and +0.8% in Croydon North (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Croydon North, while Coburg North went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Coburg North and 1.6% in Croydon North, so landlords in Coburg North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Coburg North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,327 against 8,092, larger than Croydon North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Croydon North for rental income, Coburg North for a lower purchase price, Croydon North for recent price momentum, Coburg North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison