Skip to main content

Coburg North vs Mulgrave

Property investment comparison - Coburg North, VIC 3058 vs Mulgrave, VIC 3170

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coburg North wins 3, Mulgrave wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoburg NorthMulgrave
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$850K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%3.14%
Gross rental yield (units)4.67%-
1-year house growth-0.2%estimate+2.3%
3-year house growth-+14.7%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.9%
Population8,32719,889

Coburg North vs Mulgrave: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Coburg North and $1.1M in Mulgrave, so Coburg North is the cheaper entry point, with Mulgrave houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Coburg North leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.20%, compared with 3.14% in Mulgrave, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.2% in Coburg North (an estimate) and +2.3% in Mulgrave, so recent momentum favours Mulgrave, while Coburg North went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Coburg North and 1.9% in Mulgrave, so landlords in Coburg North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mulgrave is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,889 against 8,327, roughly 2.4 times the size of Coburg North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Coburg North for rental income, Coburg North for a lower purchase price, Mulgrave for recent price momentum, Coburg North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison