Coburg vs Jan Juc
Property investment comparison - Coburg, VIC 3058 vs Jan Juc, VIC 3226
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coburg wins 3, Jan Juc wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Coburg | Jan Juc |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $590K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.12% | 2.80% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.10% | 4.00% |
| 1-year house growth | +3.0%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 1.6% |
| Population | 26,574 | 4,151 |
Coburg vs Jan Juc: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Coburg and $1.3M in Jan Juc.
On cash flow, Coburg leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.12%, compared with 2.80% in Jan Juc, a gap of 0.32 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Coburg and 1.6% in Jan Juc, so landlords in Coburg face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Coburg is the bigger suburb, with a population of 26,574 against 4,151, roughly 6 times the size of Jan Juc; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Coburg for rental income, Coburg for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison