Skip to main content

Coburg vs Mitcham

Property investment comparison - Coburg, VIC 3058 vs Mitcham, VIC 3132

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coburg wins 3, Mitcham wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoburgMitcham
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$590K$840K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.12%2.87%
Gross rental yield (units)5.10%-
1-year house growth+3.0%estimate+3.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.4%1.0%
Population26,57416,795

Coburg vs Mitcham: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Coburg and $1.3M in Mitcham, so Coburg is the cheaper entry point, with Mitcham houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Coburg sits at a median of $590K against $840K in Mitcham, which makes Coburg the more affordable unit market and Mitcham the pricier one.

On cash flow, Coburg leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.12%, compared with 2.87% in Mitcham, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.0% in Coburg (an estimate) and +3.5% in Mitcham (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Mitcham, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Mitcham and 1.4% in Coburg, so landlords in Mitcham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Coburg is the bigger suburb, with a population of 26,574 against 16,795, larger than Mitcham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Coburg for rental income, Coburg for a lower purchase price, Mitcham for recent price momentum, Mitcham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison