Coburg vs Taminick
Property investment comparison - Coburg, VIC 3058 vs Taminick, VIC 3675
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coburg wins 2, Taminick wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Coburg | Taminick |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $590K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.12% | 2.03% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.10% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +3.0%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | - |
| Population | 26,574 | 139 |
Coburg vs Taminick: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.3M in Coburg and $1.3M in Taminick, so Coburg is the cheaper entry point, with Taminick houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Coburg leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.12%, compared with 2.03% in Taminick, a gap of 1.09 percentage points.
Coburg is the bigger suburb, with a population of 26,574 against 139, roughly 191 times the size of Taminick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Coburg for rental income, Coburg for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison