Skip to main content

Cockatoo vs Skye

Property investment comparison - Cockatoo, VIC 3781 vs Skye, VIC 3977

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cockatoo wins 3, Skye wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCockatooSkye
Median house price$850K$860K
Median unit price$415K$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.99%
Gross rental yield (units)3.58%4.57%
1-year house growth+4.4%+8.2%
3-year house growth+7.9%+13.2%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.0%
Population4,4088,088

Cockatoo vs Skye: what the numbers say

The median house price is $850K in Cockatoo and $860K in Skye, so Cockatoo is the cheaper entry point, with Skye houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Cockatoo sits at a median of $415K against $630K in Skye, which makes Cockatoo the more affordable unit market and Skye the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.4% in Cockatoo and +8.2% in Skye, so recent momentum favours Skye, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Cockatoo houses are +7.9% and Skye houses +13.2%, so Skye has compounded faster than Cockatoo over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Cockatoo and 1.0% in Skye, so landlords in Cockatoo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Skye is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,088 against 4,408, larger than Cockatoo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cockatoo for a lower purchase price, Skye for recent price momentum, Cockatoo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison