Codrington vs Kyabram
Property investment comparison - Codrington, VIC 3285 vs Kyabram, VIC 3620
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Codrington wins 1, Kyabram wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Codrington | Kyabram |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $505K | $505K |
| Median unit price | - | $350K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.93% | 4.40% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +11.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | +5.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.4% | 0.1% |
| Population | 37 | 7,416 |
Codrington vs Kyabram: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $505K in Codrington and $505K in Kyabram.
On cash flow, Codrington leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.93%, compared with 4.40% in Kyabram, a gap of 1.53 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Kyabram and 2.4% in Codrington, so landlords in Kyabram face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kyabram is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,416 against 37, roughly 200 times the size of Codrington; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Codrington for rental income, Kyabram for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison