Coldstream vs Tarnook
Property investment comparison - Coldstream, VIC 3770 vs Tarnook, VIC 3670
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coldstream wins 2, Tarnook wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Coldstream | Tarnook |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $905K | $905K |
| Median unit price | $610K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.83% | 2.17% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.51% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +5.5%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 3.5% |
| Population | 2,199 | 103 |
Coldstream vs Tarnook: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $905K in Coldstream and $905K in Tarnook.
On cash flow, Coldstream leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.83%, compared with 2.17% in Tarnook, a gap of 1.66 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Coldstream and 3.5% in Tarnook, so landlords in Coldstream face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Coldstream is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,199 against 103, roughly 21 times the size of Tarnook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Coldstream for rental income, Coldstream for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison