Collie vs Spalding
Property investment comparison - Collie, WA 6225 vs Spalding, WA 6530
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Collie wins 2, Spalding wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Collie | Spalding |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $530K | $510K |
| Median unit price | $220K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.60% | 5.20% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.65% |
| 1-year house growth | +18.0% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +78.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 1.2% |
| Population | 7,599 | 1,992 |
Collie vs Spalding: what the numbers say
The median house price is $530K in Collie and $510K in Spalding, so Spalding is the cheaper entry point, with Collie houses about 4% dearer.
On cash flow, Collie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.60%, compared with 5.20% in Spalding, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Collie and 1.2% in Spalding, so landlords in Collie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Collie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,599 against 1,992, roughly 3.8 times the size of Spalding; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Collie for rental income, Spalding for a lower purchase price, Collie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison