Skip to main content

Collingwood vs Modewarre

Property investment comparison - Collingwood, VIC 3066 vs Modewarre, VIC 3240

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Collingwood wins 5, Modewarre wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCollingwoodModewarre
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$625K$665K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%2.89%
Gross rental yield (units)5.75%4.64%
1-year house growth+1.4%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.2%2.0%
Population9,179277

Collingwood vs Modewarre: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Collingwood and $1.3M in Modewarre, so Collingwood is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Collingwood sits at a median of $625K against $665K in Modewarre, which makes Collingwood the more affordable unit market and Modewarre the pricier one.

On cash flow, Collingwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.13%, compared with 2.89% in Modewarre, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Collingwood and 2.0% in Modewarre, so landlords in Collingwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Collingwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,179 against 277, roughly 33 times the size of Modewarre; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Collingwood for rental income, Collingwood for a lower purchase price, Collingwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison