Skip to main content

Concord vs La Perouse

Property investment comparison - Concord, NSW 2137 vs La Perouse, NSW 2036

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Concord wins 0, La Perouse wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricConcordLa Perouse
Median house price$3.3M$3.2M
Median unit price$1.6M$970K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.78%2.73%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.57%
1-year house growth-0.9%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.2%1.4%
Population14,551366

Concord vs La Perouse: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.3M in Concord and $3.2M in La Perouse, so La Perouse is the cheaper entry point, with Concord houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Concord sits at a median of $1.6M against $970K in La Perouse, which makes La Perouse the more affordable unit market and Concord the pricier one.

On cash flow, La Perouse leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.73%, compared with 1.78% in Concord, a gap of 0.95 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in La Perouse and 2.2% in Concord, so landlords in La Perouse face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Concord is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,551 against 366, roughly 40 times the size of La Perouse; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: La Perouse for rental income, La Perouse for a lower purchase price, La Perouse for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison