Condah vs Werribee
Property investment comparison - Condah, VIC 3303 vs Werribee, VIC 3030
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Condah wins 1, Werribee wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Condah | Werribee |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $670K | $675K |
| Median unit price | - | $475K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.79% | 3.70% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.45% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 2.4% |
| Population | 104 | 50,027 |
Condah vs Werribee: what the numbers say
The median house price is $670K in Condah and $675K in Werribee, so Condah is the cheaper entry point, with Werribee houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Werribee leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 1.79% in Condah, a gap of 1.91 percentage points.
Werribee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 50,027 against 104, roughly 481 times the size of Condah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Werribee for rental income, Condah for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison