Skip to main content

Condell Park vs Dudley

Property investment comparison - Condell Park, NSW 2200 vs Dudley, NSW 2290

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Condell Park wins 1, Dudley wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCondell ParkDudley
Median house price$1.7M$1.7M
Median unit price$990K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.80%2.51%
Gross rental yield (units)3.95%4.27%
1-year house growth+8.1%+10.4%
3-year house growth+28.9%+31.8%
Vacancy rate1.4%0.6%
Population13,0662,505

Condell Park vs Dudley: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.7M in Condell Park and $1.7M in Dudley.

On cash flow, Condell Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.80%, compared with 2.51% in Dudley, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.1% in Condell Park and +10.4% in Dudley, so recent momentum favours Dudley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Condell Park houses are +28.9% and Dudley houses +31.8%, so Dudley has compounded faster than Condell Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Dudley and 1.4% in Condell Park, so landlords in Dudley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Condell Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,066 against 2,505, roughly 5 times the size of Dudley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Condell Park for rental income, Dudley for recent price momentum, Dudley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison