Skip to main content

Connewarre vs Fairfield

Property investment comparison - Connewarre, VIC 3227 vs Fairfield, VIC 3078

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Connewarre wins 1, Fairfield wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricConnewarreFairfield
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$340K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.29%2.59%
Gross rental yield (units)8.88%4.42%
1-year house growth+2.8%estimate+6.1%
3-year house growth-+13.2%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.0%
Population9536,535

Connewarre vs Fairfield: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Connewarre and $1.8M in Fairfield, so Fairfield is the cheaper entry point, with Connewarre houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Fairfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.59%, compared with 2.29% in Connewarre, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.8% in Connewarre (an estimate) and +6.1% in Fairfield, so recent momentum favours Fairfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Fairfield and 1.6% in Connewarre, so landlords in Fairfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fairfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,535 against 953, roughly 7 times the size of Connewarre; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fairfield for rental income, Fairfield for a lower purchase price, Fairfield for recent price momentum, Fairfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Connewarre vs Fairfield: Suburb Comparison 2026