Skip to main content

Cooks Hill vs Redhead

Property investment comparison - Cooks Hill, NSW 2300 vs Redhead, NSW 2290

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cooks Hill wins 2, Redhead wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCooks HillRedhead
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$930K$920K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.23%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.75%-
1-year house growth+6.5%estimate+8.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%2.3%
Population3,7743,785

Cooks Hill vs Redhead: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Cooks Hill and $1.8M in Redhead, so Cooks Hill is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Cooks Hill sits at a median of $930K against $920K in Redhead, which makes Redhead the more affordable unit market and Cooks Hill the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.5% in Cooks Hill (an estimate) and +8.1% in Redhead (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Redhead, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Cooks Hill and 2.3% in Redhead, so landlords in Cooks Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Redhead is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,785 against 3,774, larger than Cooks Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cooks Hill for a lower purchase price, Redhead for recent price momentum, Cooks Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison