Cooks Hill vs Tempe
Property investment comparison - Cooks Hill, NSW 2300 vs Tempe, NSW 2044
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cooks Hill wins 4, Tempe wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cooks Hill | Tempe |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | $1.8M |
| Median unit price | $930K | $1.7M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.23% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.75% | 1.83% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.5%estimate | +4.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +20.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| Population | 3,774 | 3,550 |
Cooks Hill vs Tempe: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.8M in Cooks Hill and $1.8M in Tempe, so Tempe is the cheaper entry point.
For units, Cooks Hill sits at a median of $930K against $1.7M in Tempe, which makes Cooks Hill the more affordable unit market and Tempe the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +6.5% in Cooks Hill (an estimate) and +4.1% in Tempe, so recent momentum favours Cooks Hill, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.6%.
Cooks Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,774 against 3,550, larger than Tempe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tempe for a lower purchase price, Cooks Hill for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison