Skip to main content

Coolangatta vs Windsor

Property investment comparison - Coolangatta, QLD 4225 vs Windsor, QLD 4030

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coolangatta wins 1, Windsor wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoolangattaWindsor
Median house price$1.7M$1.7M
Median unit price$1.3M$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.54%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.93%
1-year house growth+6.0%estimate+12.4%
3-year house growth-+40.4%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.0%
Population6,4917,811

Coolangatta vs Windsor: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Coolangatta and $1.7M in Windsor, so Windsor is the cheaper entry point, with Coolangatta houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Coolangatta sits at a median of $1.3M against $820K in Windsor, which makes Windsor the more affordable unit market and Coolangatta the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.0% in Coolangatta (an estimate) and +12.4% in Windsor, so recent momentum favours Windsor, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Coolangatta and 1.0% in Windsor, so landlords in Coolangatta face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Windsor is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,811 against 6,491, larger than Coolangatta; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Windsor for a lower purchase price, Windsor for recent price momentum, Coolangatta for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison