Skip to main content

Coolbinia vs Salter Point

Property investment comparison - Coolbinia, WA 6050 vs Salter Point, WA 6152

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coolbinia wins 1, Salter Point wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoolbiniaSalter Point
Median house price$2.1M$2.2M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)2.36%2.50%
Gross rental yield (units)4.80%4.89%
1-year house growth+7.8%estimate+15.8%
3-year house growth-+43.3%
Vacancy rate1.7%1.1%
Population1,7512,913

Coolbinia vs Salter Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Coolbinia and $2.2M in Salter Point, so Coolbinia is the cheaper entry point, with Salter Point houses about 5% dearer.

On cash flow, Salter Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.50%, compared with 2.36% in Coolbinia, a gap of 0.14 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.8% in Coolbinia (an estimate) and +15.8% in Salter Point, so recent momentum favours Salter Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Salter Point and 1.7% in Coolbinia, so landlords in Salter Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Salter Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,913 against 1,751, larger than Coolbinia; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Salter Point for rental income, Coolbinia for a lower purchase price, Salter Point for recent price momentum, Salter Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison