Skip to main content

Coolbinia vs Wembley Downs

Property investment comparison - Coolbinia, WA 6050 vs Wembley Downs, WA 6019

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coolbinia wins 0, Wembley Downs wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoolbiniaWembley Downs
Median house price$2.1M$2.1M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)2.36%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.80%6.30%
1-year house growth+7.8%estimate+9.2%
3-year house growth-+36.7%
Vacancy rate1.7%1.6%
Population1,7516,743

Coolbinia vs Wembley Downs: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Coolbinia and $2.1M in Wembley Downs, so Wembley Downs is the cheaper entry point, with Coolbinia houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.8% in Coolbinia (an estimate) and +9.2% in Wembley Downs, so recent momentum favours Wembley Downs, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Wembley Downs and 1.7% in Coolbinia, so landlords in Wembley Downs face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wembley Downs is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,743 against 1,751, roughly 3.9 times the size of Coolbinia; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wembley Downs for a lower purchase price, Wembley Downs for recent price momentum, Wembley Downs for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison