Skip to main content

Coolum Beach vs Kelvin Grove

Property investment comparison - Coolum Beach, QLD 4573 vs Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coolum Beach wins 1, Kelvin Grove wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoolum BeachKelvin Grove
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$1.1M$845K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.48%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.30%
1-year house growth+12.2%+13.8%estimate
3-year house growth+29.0%-
Vacancy rate0.7%1.4%
Population9,1527,909

Coolum Beach vs Kelvin Grove: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.6M in Coolum Beach and $1.6M in Kelvin Grove.

For units, Coolum Beach sits at a median of $1.1M against $845K in Kelvin Grove, which makes Kelvin Grove the more affordable unit market and Coolum Beach the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.2% in Coolum Beach and +13.8% in Kelvin Grove (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Kelvin Grove, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Coolum Beach and 1.4% in Kelvin Grove, so landlords in Coolum Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Coolum Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,152 against 7,909, larger than Kelvin Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kelvin Grove for recent price momentum, Coolum Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison