Skip to main content

Coolum Beach vs Kenmore Hills

Property investment comparison - Coolum Beach, QLD 4573 vs Kenmore Hills, QLD 4069

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coolum Beach wins 4, Kenmore Hills wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoolum BeachKenmore Hills
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$1.1M-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.21%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.60%
1-year house growth+12.2%+4.1%
3-year house growth+29.0%+16.8%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.6%
Population9,1522,448

Coolum Beach vs Kenmore Hills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Coolum Beach and $1.6M in Kenmore Hills, so Coolum Beach is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.2% in Coolum Beach and +4.1% in Kenmore Hills, so recent momentum favours Coolum Beach, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Coolum Beach houses are +29.0% and Kenmore Hills houses +16.8%, so Coolum Beach has compounded faster than Kenmore Hills over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Coolum Beach and 1.6% in Kenmore Hills, so landlords in Coolum Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Coolum Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,152 against 2,448, roughly 3.7 times the size of Kenmore Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Coolum Beach for a lower purchase price, Coolum Beach for recent price momentum, Coolum Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison