Skip to main content

Coopers Shoot vs Mosman

Property investment comparison - Coopers Shoot, NSW 2479 vs Mosman, NSW 2088

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coopers Shoot wins 2, Mosman wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoopers ShootMosman
Median house price$7.3M$5.3M
Median unit price$1.1M$1.4M
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.15%
Gross rental yield (units)3.23%-
1-year house growth+2.1%-8.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.0%1.8%
Population40928,329

Coopers Shoot vs Mosman: what the numbers say

The median house price is $7.3M in Coopers Shoot and $5.3M in Mosman, so Mosman is the cheaper entry point, with Coopers Shoot houses about 36% dearer.

For units, Coopers Shoot sits at a median of $1.1M against $1.4M in Mosman, which makes Coopers Shoot the more affordable unit market and Mosman the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.1% in Coopers Shoot and -8.4% in Mosman (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Coopers Shoot, while Mosman went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Mosman and 2.0% in Coopers Shoot, so landlords in Mosman face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mosman is the bigger suburb, with a population of 28,329 against 409, roughly 69 times the size of Coopers Shoot; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mosman for a lower purchase price, Coopers Shoot for recent price momentum, Mosman for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison