Skip to main content

Cooran vs Darra

Property investment comparison - Cooran, QLD 4569 vs Darra, QLD 4076

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cooran wins 2, Darra wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCooranDarra
Median house price$995K$990K
Median unit price$700K$800K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.57%3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)2.41%3.31%
1-year house growth+10.0%estimate+15.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.3%1.4%
Population1,7564,098

Cooran vs Darra: what the numbers say

The median house price is $995K in Cooran and $990K in Darra, so Darra is the cheaper entry point, with Cooran houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Cooran sits at a median of $700K against $800K in Darra, which makes Cooran the more affordable unit market and Darra the pricier one.

On cash flow, Cooran leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.57%, compared with 3.10% in Darra, a gap of 0.47 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.0% in Cooran (an estimate) and +15.7% in Darra (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Darra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Darra and 3.3% in Cooran, so landlords in Darra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Darra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,098 against 1,756, roughly 2.3 times the size of Cooran; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cooran for rental income, Darra for a lower purchase price, Darra for recent price momentum, Darra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison