Skip to main content

Cooran vs Griffin

Property investment comparison - Cooran, QLD 4569 vs Griffin, QLD 4503

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cooran wins 1, Griffin wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCooranGriffin
Median house price$995K$995K
Median unit price$700K$780K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.57%3.63%
Gross rental yield (units)2.41%-
1-year house growth+10.0%estimate+15.6%
3-year house growth-+43.0%
Vacancy rate3.3%1.0%
Population1,75612,295

Cooran vs Griffin: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $995K in Cooran and $995K in Griffin.

For units, Cooran sits at a median of $700K against $780K in Griffin, which makes Cooran the more affordable unit market and Griffin the pricier one.

On cash flow, Griffin leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.63%, compared with 3.57% in Cooran, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.0% in Cooran (an estimate) and +15.6% in Griffin, so recent momentum favours Griffin, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Griffin and 3.3% in Cooran, so landlords in Griffin face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Griffin is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,295 against 1,756, roughly 7 times the size of Cooran; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Griffin for rental income, Griffin for recent price momentum, Griffin for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison